Bill Konrad said:
I think we need to aim for the semi-mythical Golden Mean in which the vast majority of the content is acceptable to the vast majority of people, even if it means excluding or "bowlderizing" a tiny fraction of content at the extreme edges.
We already have processes to do that, and they're in operation on a daily basis, on an article-by-article, picture-by-picture basis. The argument here seems to stem from the fact that, so far, we have not reached a consensus that the item in question is either acceptable for inline use or for linking, nor a consensus to delete it. If a consensus had been found for any of those, we would not be having this discussion. On the other hand I think we're getting towards a working conensus now. We currently seem to have an inlined drawing (not ideal, I think Rama can do better) and a link to the photographic image underneath.