RK wrote in part:
We DO NOT have Evolution (Gould) Evolution (Dawkins) Evolution (Darwin) Evolution (Mayr) and...Evolution!
However, we do have [[Punctuated equilibrium]]. That's analogous to [[Evolution (Gould)]] for number of articles. It's analogous as far as names are concerend, but then those names are strawmen.
Worst of all, the primary page [[Gaia theory]] is very misleading...because Anthere refuses to let us discuss gaia theory here! Instead, she focuses on pre-gaia theory theology and mysticism, and on radical left-wing politics! She forces any real discussion of Gaia theory into sub-pages. That is bizarre. I don't know what her college is like, but among *English* speakers, the phrase "Gaia theory" refers exclusively to a scientific thoery.
This is certainly not true, as I know from personal experience. Perhaps it's true among those English speakers that RK hangs out with.
(Of course, RK also gave a false vandalism alert for an edit war, so he automatically loses it by my standards. ^_^)
-- Toby