I seem to have caused a bit of a stir on the AfD for the article Ghost ramp. I commented that if the Keep advocates don't fix the fundamental problems identified with the article at its previous AfD two months ago - which are: no reliable source for the name, no reliable source for the description and all the inclusions sourced to maps and satellite photos, i.e. original research - then I will delete it as original research.
Since the AfD was started there have been only three edits to the article, and the only sources added are of the same kind. Am I really completely off-base in thinking that direct interpretation of maps and satellite photos is original research? I can't really see it as anything else.
Ghost ramp is an interesting topic, but we do have these policies...
Guy (JzG)