On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 14:31, Daniel Mayer wrote:
Cunc wrote:
Lies, lies. You said "decision", not "consensus".
Two very different things.
Eh? Consensus is used to arrive at decisions. Semantic arguments tire me - esp since they tend to change the subject of discussions.
By that logic, a Dodge Dart is equivalent to New York City, since cars are used to arrive at destinations.
If you're going to put words in my mouth, I'd appreciate it if you respect the meaning of those words.
There certainly had been a consensus, a consensus of people who had little-to-no involvement in developing the entries. The discussion naturally attracted people who wanted to change the status quo, rather than those who were happy with it. Shouldn't a proper consensus involve more than a people who all want to jump on the same bandwagon?
Popularity arguments tire me - esp when they involve groupthink.