At least they tried to create a compendium of valid criticism without the crap that Wikitruth has. Now it's just full of conspiracy theories.
-Sean William
On 6/27/07, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly, who knows. But I call it an attack site bc whatever nice language they use, it was expressly created to complain about admins.
On 6/27/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/06/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 27 Jun 2007 at 15:58:52 -0700, "Steven Walling" steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
This is totally asinine. It's just a personal attack site. At least Wikitruth is A: funny at times and B:actually contains recognized
criticisms
of Wikipedia, not just personal vendettas.
So is it an "Attack Site", like in, you'll burn in Hell for eternity, or at least deserve to be banned from Wikipedia as a troll, if you commit the unpardonable sin of linking to it?
Have a look at the entries for the major proponents of BADSITES, and then draw your own conclusions...
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l