On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:07 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 6/25/2008 2:28:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, arromdee@rahul.net writes:
Other than my say-so, do we have a source for the claim that someone born in Detroit, Michigan was born in the United States?
Hiragana is unambiguous. You can look up exactly what it is. When you look it up you get "Tessaiga", not "Tetsusaiga". It doesn't take any interpretation to do so. There are no serious claims that the Japanese version doesn't say "Tessaiga".>>
Then you should have no problem presenting a source which states that.
Will Johnson
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I don't think it requires any undue or novel synthesis to use very simple logic. "A is wholly contained by B", therefore "Anything in A is also in B". Detroit is wholly contained by the US, so anything or anyone in Detroit is also in the US. Anyone making any -other- claim would be the one making an extraordinary claim, and would require extraordinary proof.