Cheney Shill wrote:
Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
charles matthews wrote: > As far as I'm concerned, Wikipedia decisions should not be taken on the > basis that someone might be offended. As far as I'm concerned, WP:NPA, WP:Wikiquette and WikiLove are the best and most important guidelines Wikipedia has.All other things equal, I agree with Charles. I still have no idea what article you are talking about, but assuming the content is relevant to the article, meets
verifiability, and does not give undue weight
to something, the only other question that remains is whether it is
somehow presented with more bias
than the sources present it. The policies/guidelines you mention are
not relevant to article content.
They are for dealing with others on Wiki, not how the article is
written or presented.
I'd say, that at least WP:NPA would need to be rewritten to reflect what you say. WP:NPA starts with "Do not make personal attacks *anywhere* in Wikipedia."
Regarding the presentation of the source: WP presents it equally anti-Islam biased as the original source.
My advice is remember this, archive it, and when you are involved in another
article (or some other
aspect of the article in dispute) where WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR
favor your position, reference this
and make sure that the rules are applied consistently.~~~~Pro-Lick
Apropos rules, which are applied consistently. Please compare http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArch...