On 13/09/06, Nathaniel spangineer@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I would be hesitant to judge the overall FAC process based on the interaction between Francesco and FAC regulars. Rare are FACs that get so heated (I recall the GNAA and Bulbasaur FACs, and that's it). In this case, it seems both sides (I include myself in this) got defensive when they perceived that their opinions were under attack (for Francesco, that his writing was poor, and for Tony/Sandy/Me, that the standards we've been applying to FACs for months are faulty). In the end (which occurred after Francesco's initial complaints on WT:FAC), I think pretty much everyone agreed that the article was at least somewhat better than it was when the nomination started. And everyone was much more calm, that's for sure.
I think a process which tests Wikipedia content creators to destruction, and whose advocates actually think this is a good thing for a process to do, is prima facie pathological and needs removal as soon as possible. It's way too damaging to the community.
As for people disappearing and not striking their objections, yes, that happens, but in my experience Raul usually ignores these after several days if the nominator makes a note under the objection saying that he/she has addressed the objection. Of course, sometimes it doesn't work out that way, especially for nominations receiving few comments.
I'm wondering if FAC shouldn't be officially deprecated - it could be preserved as a source of quirkies for the front page, but it certainly seems less and less like anything to do with general Wikipedia quality.
- d.