On Dec 5, 2007 9:34 AM, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/4/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a positive or negative sign, but it struck me as an amusing experiment!
You loaded the article and found exactly the information you were looking for, without having to dig six months into the edit history (as I've needed to do, on certain occasions where a once-informative article had been chopped and screwed beyond recognition). How could yours be a negative sign?
—C.W.
Because we're writing an encyclopaedia people want to read, rather than an encyclopaedia we want people to want to read. ;)
Cheers WilyD