On 4/5/06, Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
\I don't think your description is particularly fair or objective. I support the removal of the image in question, but I recognise that at least some of those who argued for it to be it kept did so out of good faith and a desire to create the best encyclopedia possible. I don't think they were trolling or motivated by a desire to supply pedophiles with child porn.
Agreed. Poor judgment sure, wrong priorities definitely, but not paedophiles (or paedophile-friendly).
Steve