On 4/23/06, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
jayjg stated for the record:
No, what the second admin should do is discuss the case with the first admin, rather than unblocking. Maybe the first admin has evidence that the second admin is unaware of. If the second admin has conclusive evidence, then the first admin will undoubtedly unblock. If not, then there is a dispute, and the second admin should not wheel war. In any event, admins should not act under the bad faith supposition that *they know better*; that is what starts the wheel war.
Jay.
The statement "if the second admin has conclusive evidence, then the first admin will undoubtedly unblock" has been recently demonstrated to be untrue -- the conclusive evidence that Eloquence is not a danger to the project is patent, yet Danny (first admin) reverted my (second admin's) unblocking.
Did you communicate first? The first reversion is wrong, regardless of who does it, unless they've communicated.
Jay.