On 3/30/07, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
I'm sorry, with due respect to Geni, this is the type of myopic response that drives me crazy. Let's worry about our policies, in house-rules, and that the rights of Wikipedians are respected - because that's obviously more important than doing the Right Thing, unharming real people, or otherwise focusing on article quality? (That was sarcasm).
Wikipedians are real people. You are not an infallible judge of what would improve an article. The community at the present time has not indicated a willingness to trust you in that sense and you should respect this.
Memento mori
The problem with deletion process is that people tend to !vote "ah, she's sort of notable so keep - the POV problems are a matter for clean-up not deletion" and then walk away. This eventualism is useless for BLP. Often we need to say - "unless someone cleans up this bio RIGHT NOW it must die." If it is just a matter of removing a bit, then OTRS folk can do that, but often the thing is intrinsically POV and the sources are all biased.
I belive the correct place to debate that kind of policy change would be [[WP:VPP]] ot [[WT:CSD]].