Rob wrote:
If someone disagrees with a deletion result, then lists it on DRV, this is generally (with the exception of vanity self-promoters, trolls, and the like) accepted as a good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia. If someone disagrees with a keep result, then lists it on DRV, this is seen by many as an "abuse of process" and an effort to "get the result he wanted". It seems that if one type of result can be reviewed and possibly overturned, what's wrong with reviewing another type of result? What's the difference?
The difference is that keeping and deleting are not symmetrical. It' s like innocent until proven guilty - it's *supposed* to be keep unless deletable. So the first is appealing a "guilty", the second is double jeopardy.
- d.