--- Dan Drake dd@dandrake.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004 13:59:43 UTC, "KNOTT, T" tknott@qcl.org.uk wrote:
He's been banned for a week, let's enforce that ban.
Does this mean that at the end of the week, he comes back unbanned? I find that completely incredible, if true(*). How many times must we appeal to the Supreme Court to get a user banned permanently when he immediately violates a ban that the AC spent vast amounts of deliberation on? Just how meaningless *is* and arbitration decision? We seem to be exploring the limits.
Absent a 142.177/EoT/24-type range block directed at the ISP and city a person edits from, it is not possible to prevent somebody from editing (even then they could edit from another computer or switch their ISP). So all we can do is block reincarnations as they come up. The AC ruling also has provisions for what to do in case of violations. However, the AC is not a police force - it is up the the Admins to enforce the ruling and for the users to inform the Admins.
-- mav
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/