geni geniice@gmail.com wrote: On 11/12/05, Brian Haws wrote:
So your concerns are about the process and not the particular arbitrator involved?
I didn't say that. We have a tempory apointed arbcom memeber who has just failed on an RFB (ok to be fair the "we don't need more buracrats" group is large enough to make promotion extreamly tricky). They then open a trainreck of a RFC. Under these conditons giving the user checkuser is unwise.
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
You feel it'd be unwise because of the possibility Kelly might abuse it?
It looks like checkuser is going to be added to the bureaucrats positions "toolkit" so if it's going to be denied to one shouldn't there be some specific reason for doing it?