On 11/28/05, John Lee johnleemk@gawab.com wrote:
Minor nit-pick: that situation is improbable because IIRC the brochure (if it used GFDL material) has to include the whole whopping GFDL licence in it.
Which is why releasing a picture under the GFDL is de facto a Wikipedia-only license. There have been a few times where I've persuaded someone to release an image under GFDL (rather than not at all) by showing them how hard it would be for someone to legally use the image outside of a Wikipedia context, especially a print one.
-Matt