Rotem Dam wrote:
OK, ok you guys don't seem to get the point of my post. What I meant was that ANY philosophical text, is inappropriate for an ENCYCLOPEDIA, because it's obviously cannot become consensus, and will always remain merely a POV.
This dilemma was examined by the philosopher Woody Allen, who proposed the following course catalog description for a class on philosophy in which "Everyone from Plato to Camus is read and the following topics are covered":
Ethics : The categorical imperative, and six ways to make it work for you. Aesthetics : Is art the mirror of life, or what? Metaphysics : What happens to the soul after death? How does it manage? Epistemology : Is knowledge knowable? If not, how do we know this? The absurd : Why existence is often considered silly, particularly for men who wear brown-and-white shoes.