On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:41:45 +0200, "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
There is every reason in the world to think that most professional cyclists, especially including Armstrong, have taken one or more prohibited substances during their career. An article which gives the opposite impression would be misleading.
A point I have made more than once. But this seems to single Armstrong out. The section is gradually getting bigger and bigger, with special pleading and guilt by association creeping back in. I do not see how it can be considered neutral to give the strong impression that he is a doper who has not been caught, which is what one or two editors are determinedly trying to do, when the legal position is that he is clean, despite being quite possibly the most tested athlete in history.
Guy (JzG)