I don't see the point in suppressing the image of a naked pre-pubescent girl. Are you claiming that such an image is obscene or something?
Wouldn't a conclusion like that be best left up to the courts to decide? I would have no problem suppressing images that a court has actually decided are obscene. But suppressing in-advance sure smells like censorship to me. And a type of censorship that no Western government is actually practicing.
Will Johnson
**************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolc...)