On 18/04/07, phoebe ayers phoebe.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/18/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/04/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/18/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Mind you, anything that makes spammers whine so exquisitely as turning on nofollow did has to be intrinsically good.
Nothing to the whining we would get if we set all links to text only (The last ditch option should spam ever become completely overwhelming to the point of threatening the existence of wikipedia in a meaningful form).
What do you mean, text only?
My brain has just kicked in and realised you mean just the text rather than a live link.
{{cite book |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |editor= |others= |title= |origdate= |origyear= |origmonth= |url= |format= |accessdate= |accessyear= |accessmonth= |edition= |series= |date= |year= |month= |publisher= |location= |language= |isbn= |oclc= |doi= |id= |pages= |chapter= |chapterurl= |quote= }} ?
"As a wiki engine develops, its wikitext syntax inevitably approaches sendmail.cf."
- d.