On 4/19/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
This is the best argument for not accepting articles which will receive no >significant attention, either from the public or from us. We have long passed the >point recent changes patrolling will catch all such vandalism.
But how to tell? And how to prevent such articles? While it could be done to an extent through a crude "any new article must have X links pointing to it" it cannot be done through deletion where we are close to capacity.