Tony Sidaway wrote:
Bill Konrad said:
Nonsense. For more than 99% of the articles there would be absolutely no question regarding whether or not the content is suitable.
I think we're talking to cross purposes. Your statement does not contradict mine.
Yes, I think there is some misuderstanding. I do not understand how you can maintain that all editors would have to bowlderize all of their edits when for more than 99% of the articles there is no consideration whatsoever of bowlderization being an issue.
Bkonrad