On 4/24/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
We have enough eyes to catch this sort of thing much faster. Can we please have some effort put into designing a system to utilize those eyes efficiently? I'm not really talking about stable versions - a simple system to list the "least examined edits" would be enough. Defining which users count as valid "examiners" would be the hardest part of the implementation, but *any* half-assed definition of who qualifies would improve the system drastically.
C'mon, this could be implemented in a couple weeks by a single person working a few hours a day. I'm forwarding this to foundation-l.
You are so, so right on the money here.
SJ