The Cunctator wrote:
On 2/26/06, Daniel P. B. Smith wikipedia2006@dpbsmith.com wrote:
From: "Steve Bennett" stevage@gmail.com
On 2/24/06, John Lee johnleemk@gawab.com wrote:
Without sources it is [[wikipedia:original research]] and inadmissible.
That's an extreme interpretation of that rule. We should shy aware from removing information simply because it is unsourced. We should only remove it if it is unsourced *and* we find it suspect.
Steve
In short, you do not agree with the verifiability policy, http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:V
I disagree with it strongly. The policy as stated goes way against the stronger policy of Assume Good Faith.
WP:NOT a feel-good social experiment. It's a project to build an encyclopedia. It's very possible to both AGF and remove the information, anyhow. Or shall we just AGF and remove all sources because it might reflect badly on the credibility of our editors?
John