Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
But in the end, no. I don't think we should have an article on somebody who is in the end "famous" solely because, well, a group of sophomoric fucktards got their rocks off laughing at his appearance.
Then you'd need to delete Star Wars Kid and Gary Broslma, for starters.
And in the end, I don't think we should *not* have an article on somebody simply because they have a serious disability which makes some people laugh at them. Equal rights, and everything, I say.
How many articles do we have on people known only for their deformities? The only one I can think of is Joseph Merrick.
FWIW, see Category:Conjoined twins and Category:Sideshow attractions.
-KeithTyler