Steve Bennett wrote:
On 2/2/07, Gregory Kohs thekohser@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what the opinions of "influential Wikipedians" are regarding this MSNBC poll that shows 40% of over a thousand people think like I do?
I think it ought to be trialled. We're all making a lot of assumptions about what would happen if paid editing were to occur. Why not do a trial on a couple of articles, and monitor but not interfere with the article over a period of a few months?
It would be totally unacceptable to take the position that an article being worked on by a paid editor could not be edited by anyone else during that time.
Ec