On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:09 -0700, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Well, so what? The list's criteria are based on _absolute_ height, not _relative_ height, and as long as this is pointed out explicitly in the description of the list I don't see the problem. We've got a list of the largest asteroids in absolute terms too.
Right, so it's only geographically, temporally and ethnically biased, which makes it - er, still crap :-)
Guy (JzG)