On Dec 10, 2007 10:15 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
That works only for !!, not for future recurrences of the same situation involving other users. !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
I recall !! was unblocked significantly before that email was posted - because some users knew that user's previous identity and because people examined !!'s contribution history and found nothing problematic.
Durova's email showed fairly convincingly that there was no secret damning evidence, however.
-Matt