On 17/02/2008, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Thomas Dalton schrieb:
Sometimes it happens, that other editors desire to include things you don't agree with. In order to write a neutral encyclopaedia it can be necessary to give even those POVs a fair share. As long as you believe, that *you know* what neutrality means and don't have to compromise, you are as likely as not working against neutrality.
You're not understanding what I said. I *want* there to be things in Wikipedia that I don't personally agree with, so it's not a compromise.
Your definition of compromise would make compromise impossible.
You *are* compromising, if you want there to be things, you don't personally agree with.
Perhaps you're meaning something different by "agree with". I mean agreeing with the statement itself, that is, thinking that it's true. Do you mean agreeing with it being in the article? There is a big difference.