Caroline Ford wrote:
Caroline Ford wrote:
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
The Block Log makes fascinating reading. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Block_log
Here are some highlights:
- Users blocked by Jimbo tend to stay unblocked
- Wik gets blocked and unblocked a lot
- Raul really wants to block Plautus
- Not one "block" citing a Committee decision
Agreed - there seems to be a lot of blocking logged in users at the moment - just because someone is annoyed with them. The precedent was set a few weeks ago, it seems to be happening at least once a day now.
Secretlondon
My worry is that if Khranus, Mr Natural Health etc had been around this week - they would have just been permanently blocked with no discussion. This _is_ what is happening at the moment - and for lesser cases as well.
I'm wondering whether we should go as far as to have a temporary time out on blocking usernames. Of course, the minute we do that we'll have Michael.
We need to put the genie back in the box.
Perhaps excessive blocking could become a blockable offense!
Ec