David Gerard wrote:
"If you have an idea that you think should become part of the corpus of knowledge that is Wikipedia, the best approach is to arrange to have your results published in a peer-reviewed journal or reputable news outlet, and then document your work in an appropriately non-partisan manner."
http://www.english.ufl.edu/imagetext/
See what I mean about the dangers of reasoning from personal ignorance? Now I eagerly await objections that don't boil down to "but webcomics are worse for Wikipedia than Pokemon."
Assuming that was directed at me, then I'm not sure what you mean about "the dangers of reasoning from personal ignorance". I was arguing against the general principle that we ought to write novel histories in cases where existing ones don't exist. If in this particular case one does exist, then of course that doesn't apply.
-Mark