On 2/28/06, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/1/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
You still haven't responded to Fastfission's account. What dispute do you have with it?
Its false portrayal of ta bu shi da yu as acting without direct and full support, its accusatory tone, its abuse of a good and conscientious administrator who came directly to Jimbo for support and obtained it (I know this for a fact), it's blatant assumption, in short, of bad faith. Its sheer unwikipedianness. I'm completely, utterly shocked rigid to see this kind of thing openly on a wikipedia mailing list. When I spoke of corrosive suspicion, this is precisely what I meant. We cannot build an encyclopedia this way. Well, maybe a huge hoard of copyright infringements, but *not* an encyclopedia.
No, not what issues with the tone do you have, but what dispute with the facts of Fastfission's account?