On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:09 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/31/2009 11:47:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.wiki@gmail.com writes:
- WikiTrust might be described as "a way to see how long an edit endured and how much trust it seems to have"; in most users' hands it'll be "its colored red/blue so its right/wrong." - People won't think, they'll assume and rely.>>
Interesting to see this by virtue of repetition in our mirrors. And our pseudo-mirrors who *don't* event state that they mirrored us. Then after a phrase has been cut from our version due to lack of source, it's put back in citing a past mirror who hasn't removed it....
Circular.
I found a Wikimania presentation earlier that showed colour coding of text according to trustworthiness and also rated contributors on a similar scale. I can't seem to find it again now though.