On Jan 28, 2008 2:52 AM, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Carl Beckhorn wrote:
Personally, I find it strange to think that any nonfree content not under the control of the foundation should appear on meta.
And I find it completely bizarre that there is apparently no place anywhere within any of the foundation's projects that we can host an image that's explicitly licensed for our use.
I'm all for free content and all, but this has the unsettling feel of fundamentalism.
The solution is probably to create an explicitly separate site hosted on Foundation servers for such material. The alternative is to alter the terms under which meta operates.
Johnleemk