On 10/3/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/10/06, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 15:23 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
The bot would have to be semi-auto, i.e. a human would have to look over the result.
What makes you say that?
(a) people will be happier if there's a human pressing the button (b) in a crappily-formatted article, the source info may be easy for a human to spot but hard for a robot. I just changed [[Riptides]] to take the {{unreferenced}} off it since the ref was given as plain text as the last paragraph. (I put that in a more standard format as well.)
While I agree there should probably someone reviewing the changes, a "patrol" would probably pop up whose sole reason for existence is to try to put sources on everything _or_ (and this is what I fear might be more likely) to speedy half the articles out of existence.
Carl