One thing that happened recently was that a user, I actually forget his name and the issue, decided he would crosspost some concern to all the members of the arbitration committee. He had no case under consideration, just wanted to cover his bases by "informing" all of us. Not too serious but just nonsense.
The policy, if any, need to contain language like "excessive", "irrelevant", etc. to properly characterize the nuisance character of spamming.
Fred
From: Optim optim81@yahoo.co.uk Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:34:34 -0800 (PST) To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] User talk page spamming (policy suggestion)
I wouldn't object a spamming policy if it could define properly what spamming is.