Delirium delirium@rufus.d2g.com wrote in part:
I propose instead we continue on the current path: list stuff that can be cleaned up on Wikipedia:Cleanup, and list stuff that should be deleted on VfD. Given that only a small minority of users have expressed opposition to "deletionism", this seems like the best way to go.
-Mark
The current path is not to keep doing what we have been doing before, but to continually improve our ways and means. To that end, I propose the following plan, which incorporates some features of suggestions made by (in alphabetical order--apologies to those who this always discriminates against): AndrewA, Angela, Jake, JamesDay, Jimbo Wales, Stevertigo, TakuyaMurata, Viajero (I know I am missing some folks.)
Core-rules: 1. Wikipedia:Cleanup be separated into 7 weekday-specific files. 2. Each such file have subheaders indicating which week the listings are from. 3. No article be listed on VFD *before* it has spent *at least* three weeks on Cleanup. 4. No article be listed on Cleanup *longer* than 12 weeks. 5. No article be blanked without the content being moved to talk.
Subsidiary recommendations: 1. Articles on Cleanup declared deletable include link to [[Wikpedia:threatened]]. 2. Articles on Cleanup declared stubby include link to [[Wikipedia:stub]]. 3. Articles on Cleanup declared otherwise troubled include link to [[Wikipedia:attention]]. 4. Articles on VFD include link to [[Wikipedia:endangered]]. 5. Articles on PNA include link to [[Wikipedia:difficult]] 6. Cleanup-Listings have score starting at -4; users can add or decrease the score by 1. 7. Listings also have deletability-score starting at +4; users adding or decreasing by 1.
Fair warning, I may reply to my own message to annotate, expand etc. the above.
Respectfully (as ever):
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen (aka Cimon Avaro)