I wasn't speculating, I was making an observation. I apologise if anyone felt it was flamebait, or overly personal. I felt it touched on a very important fact, the views on policy presented publically by a newly appointed arbiter.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 8/25/05, steve v vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
I dont think the last few comments have been very helpful. Jay has yet to give Michael a straight answer on the specific block issue. Jays claim that the use of an ancient ethnic name as provokational is really very one-sided and has little substance, as is his representation of that history. And Jack's personal speculations about Jay's objectivity are flamebait at best.
SV " And let's also not forget..let's not forget... Dude..that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city... That isn't legal either."
--- Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com wrote:
This discussion keeps reminding me of a photo I saw once that moved me alot (I can't seem to find it now). In it a black woman had thrown herself on top of a severely beaten KKK member in order to save him from an angry crowd. She had the moral highground. The newly appointed arbiter appears not to.
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l