On 02/04/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure it's so much "require authorisation" as making the point that it *isn't* a shield of arms. It looks like one, it feels like one, but it *isn't* one. My understanding is that if you're using it as a shield, it has to be authorised; in this case, it isn't, so it's simply a pretty and confusing logo.
Well, the school is using it everywhere that it previously used its traditional shield; that would seem to imply that it is in fact a shield. I have sent an enquiry to the school and will update the article when I get a response.