David Gerard wrote:
On 09/03/2008, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/03/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Notice also the complete refusal to address the question "so how would you phrase severely defective judgement on the part of a nominator?" Said severely defective judgement being much of the problem with AFD. This is going to take interested parties diving in. This means you.
Usually "I disagree with the nominator for reasons X Y Z".
This fails to address the case where the jawdropping lack of good judgement is the actual problem with the nominations, and that poisons AFD in general. Pretending the actual problem isn't a problem is not really an option any more.
There is a recurrent quality to the problem. How long has it been since we solved the world's problems by chnging VfD to AfD?
Ec