On 11/22/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Puppy wrote:
<snip> > This is not to say that improving and expanding such articles is not > desirable - after all, we wish to be the premier source of general > information on everything - but it is not due to gender bias, and to > imply that it is to me is reinforcing the > "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".
Actually, your argument here is serving /that/ purpose quite well.
WTF? I don't know what's more wrong with that statement - its blatent misogyny, or the fact that it's an empty-headed, shallow and just plain incorrect statemen (quite unlike KC's carefully rational argument supported by both anecdote and data)
OK, I'm convinced - time to go clean the kitchen so that I can actually get my contribution to housework up to the 10% I think I do...