On 8/25/07, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/25/07, K P kpbotany@gmail.com wrote: [snip]
even an entire article in Wikipedia is seldom ever the contribution of only one editor,
Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
All the data that I've seen so far suggest that most articles may well be the product of single authors. Not most high profile articles, or most featured articles, ... but most articles. Most articles are mostly short and on obsecure matters.
Yes, most have had edits by a few others. But these edits are overwhelmingly tagging and markup related. It would often be hard to argue that they were substantial enough to carry a copyright interest, and no one sane would argue that such edits are enough to rightly call the editor an author.
So, I'm wrong but right in the details? Or vice versa. It's still different than an image.
KP