Adam von [name omitted for privacy reasons] wrote:
Yes, but try and remember that it is Jimbo who has the problem with me, not I who has the problem with Jimbo. There is naught that I can to do to sway Jimbo, and in fact, this post here will almost certainly serve to harden Jimbo against me, for he has consistently sent me angry letters after any public statement in which I criticize him; he will certainly find it critical for me to "put the blame on him" and state that it is him who keeps me banned, not I (through my refusal to atone for various grievances) who keeps me banned.
I have only complained to you privately when you have publicly lied about the reasons that you were banned.
In any event, I'll gladly agree that you remain banned on my say-so, as opposed to your own say-so. But the ban remains in place because of your refusal to agree to some basic standards of behavior, and your refusal to apologize for your past dishonest actions.
If you're willing now to do those things, and to genuinely reform your behavior, then we can talk.
Also, I do believe I have stated that my name isn't Adam on numerous occasions.
Well, if you don't want people to call you Adam, Adam, then you should reconfigure your software to reflect your name-of-choice. Right now, emails from you appear to come from "Adam von [name omitted for privacy reasons]".
--Jimbo