Well, I don't mind that these things run without financial compensation. But it would be nice to receive credit. The Brandeis restoration especially was a difficult job that took about three days.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Durovanadezhda.durova@gmail.com wrote:
And the government of Australia appears to be using the restoration of Douglas MacArthur uncredited. http://www.ww2australia.gov.au/waratsea/kamikaze.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Douglas_MacArthur_lands_Leyte1.jpg
Yeah but now you're getting really subtle. Crediting a restoration is a less obvious thing to do, and probably less serious if they don't. Speaking for myself, I often disregard copyright notices when the source material is clearly very old - I assume the copyright notices have been plastered all over without thought. But maybe I'm missing transformation processes...
Btw, found an even better reuse of one of my images:
http://article.wn.com/view/2007/11/30/A_man_says_he_was_robbed_of_700_during...
Kind of amusing. The text even refers to a "pickup" truck, not a cement mixer...
Steve
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l