On 21/03/2008, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
I want to do that later on. Lets start general and then go to specifics. Is everyone in this thread satisfied with how arbcom runs? How much experience did you have with them?
That's not how it works. You start with specifics and then generalise. Trying to do it backwards doesn't work (what's the point in discussing specific cases once you've already established the general case?). You wish a particular action to take place (disbanding arbcom), so the burden of proof is on you. Present your evidence.