On 10/11/07, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is seriously suggesting that Brandt, Bagley, or any other nutjob running an attack site be taken seriously. But we can do a better job of confronting them than removing all links to them. If somebody who is smart enough and respected enough to write the headline story for Slate can fall for Brandt's shit, it's probably time for us to wake up and realize that Brandt is pretty good at what he does, and needs a response beyond censorship.
I think you should consider that and then consider apologizing for calling me a troll because I've taken Brandt seriously.
If Brandt is full of shit, prove it. Feel free to do this privately if you'd like.