On 4/7/06, Jay Whetherspoon polynomialjay@gmail.com wrote:
That's ridiculous. Ten minutes of research, even, will clarify to anyone who viewed the image that it is _not_ legally child pornography, no matter how you interpret the PROTECT Act's constitutionality. There's no legal reason to remove a completely legal image.
Expect that it was a "fair use" image used without permission from its author, who might be very pissed his or her "art" is hosted on Wikipedia...
-- mvh Björn