On 6/10/07, David Mestel david.mestel@gmail.com wrote:
Except that since there seem to be more articles requiring improvement than there are people willing or able to devote time to improving them, the question is not "would we want the article if it were improved?", but "do we think that the article in its current state is beneficial to the quality of the encyclopedia?".
Except in the most extreme cases, deletion should be considered only after other measures have failed.
—C.W.