On 6/17/07, elisabeth bauer eflebeth@googlemail.com wrote:
2007/6/17, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com:
On 6/17/07, elisabeth bauer eflebeth@googlemail.com wrote:
That it would be already a violation of policy to '''use''' proxies or anonymizers is a fairly new interpretation of the original descriptive policy "open proxies may be blocked at any time" and I am not sure that it is a valid one.
The WP:NOP policy has, since its inception, banned open proxies from editing Wikipedia, regardless of the specific wording.
Open proxies, yes. But it never tried to extra punish users for the use of open proxies or anonymizers (apart from the collateral damage when a vandal using the same IP was blocked).
"Extra punish" in what way?
Until recently it even tried to help innocent users affected by such a block (i.e. recommending chinese tor users to ask for a soft block).
That was an essay, not policy.
From giving up this for practical reasons toward punishing and blocking good users deliberately for using anonymizers is quite a large step and one that is not covered by wikimedia wide consensus.
Who has suggested that?