Mathias Schindler wrote:
On 1/3/07, Gurch matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
So Google has basically created a database of all Wikipedia's infoboxes, and is serving up entries from them as search results on its website? Does this count as mirroring our content? Are they in compliance with whatever rules apply to whatever it is they're doing?
They are extracting mere facts, there is no copyright on facts. US law (AFAIK) does not know a copyright on databases as such (different in the EU). They are attributing the source along with a link on the wikipedia site. IMHO, they are compliant in both the legal and the moral part.
Aside from that, something concerns me here. These snippets are displayed right at the top of search pages, above the search results, even when the Wikipedia article itself is nowhere near the top search result. In other words, anyone who manages to sneak the right value in at the critical moment when Google is re-indexing the page can achieve an effect similar to a [[Googlebomb]], but even more powerful. How long before people start craftily changing infobox labels and values in an attempt to abuse this?
That would be pretty much pointless. In case you are worrying, you might want to help bring the "stable version" feature back to life...
How would I go about doing that? Also, when you say "back to life", are you suggesting it is somehow "dead"? I was under the impression the devs were planning to implement stable versions properly as soon as they finished single login.